Alt
Free Agent
Posts: 102
Likes: 81
I am Offline
Last On: Feb 16, 2017 12:09:47 GMT 1
|
Post by Alt on Feb 11, 2015 18:34:31 GMT 1
Yes, I'm saying right about this changed rule. The idea, that result can be changed after a match, is nothing but nonsense. Rule of "Fair play" is only for players. And there is only one way to use it. Right after the goal is scored, captain of a team may ask not to count this goal because of lags or another reasons. The captain of other team may agree with that or not, the decision shall be made only by him and only during this pause time. And that's all, this decision is final. This order of things is normal for all sports. You can not imagine a situation for example, when after the FA Cups match Chelsea 3-2 Liverpool was ended, the result would have been revised and changed due to the fact that Liverpool's player was lying on the lawn after an injury, when the Chelsea scored first goal. And you can not imagine that a month later teams would have to continue the match with the score 2-2 and play overtime because of it. Result after the final whistle is final and can not be reviewed and changed for all sports, and it should be so in our league. Please, read the rules again. "If players have stopped due to a connection problem and a goal is scored then that goal shall be disallowed. This decision will be made by both team Captains immediately during the game time, if the captain of the lagged team made no claims to the specific moment, it will not be discussed after the game ended." , seriosly? You really can not see any differences between what I'm talking about and this rule? - If players have stopped due to a connection problem and a goal is scored then that goal shall be disallowed. This decision will be made by both team Captains and if required will be reviewed by the League Admins following the game for the final decision.1. There should not be "by both team Captains". One request, another decide. 2. There should not be any "will be reviewed by the League Admins" after match.
|
|
Alt
Free Agent
Posts: 102
Likes: 81
I am Offline
Last On: Feb 16, 2017 12:09:47 GMT 1
|
Post by Alt on Feb 11, 2015 18:48:09 GMT 1
Since when Chelsea and Liverpool players play on internet connection and their performance depends on stability of internet? Injury can be analog of some lag, I think =)) I only understand that its better to make decision during that pause, so we know what score it currently is in the moment + captains agreement on fp is easier and admins dont have work after the game. Yes, that's what I'm talking about.
|
|
Gele
Free Agent
Posts: 817
Likes: 809
I am Offline
Last On: Oct 12, 2016 18:51:28 GMT 1
|
Post by Gele on Feb 11, 2015 19:08:40 GMT 1
Dude, you are talking about the old rule all the time. We changed it a month ago.
|
|
Alt
Free Agent
Posts: 102
Likes: 81
I am Offline
Last On: Feb 16, 2017 12:09:47 GMT 1
|
Post by Alt on Feb 11, 2015 19:25:41 GMT 1
Trolling or what?
This is new rule.
- If players have stopped due to a connection problem and a goal is scored then that goal shall be disallowed. This decision will be made by both team Captains and if required will be reviewed by the League Admins following the game for the final decision. - If players have stopped due to a connection problem and a goal is scored then that goal shall be disallowed. This decision will be made by both team Captains immediately during the game time, if the captain of the lagged team made no claims to the specific moment, it will not be discussed after the game ended.
And I'm telling that this new rule sucks and explaining why.
|
|
Gele
Free Agent
Posts: 817
Likes: 809
I am Offline
Last On: Oct 12, 2016 18:51:28 GMT 1
|
Post by Gele on Feb 11, 2015 19:31:10 GMT 1
The first line is the rule as it was before, the second line is the new rule.
|
|
Alt
Free Agent
Posts: 102
Likes: 81
I am Offline
Last On: Feb 16, 2017 12:09:47 GMT 1
|
Post by Alt on Feb 11, 2015 19:50:05 GMT 1
Oh, ok. My mistake. I thought it is parts of one. But problem isn't solved anyway.
- If players have stopped due to a connection problem and a goal is scored then that goal shall be disallowed. This decision will be made by both team Captains immediately during the game time, if the captain of the lagged team made no claims to the specific moment, it will not be discussed after the game ended.
1. There is still "by both team Captains". What if they have different viewpoints on situation? 2. There is still "if the captain of the lagged team made no claims to the specific moment, it will not be discussed after the game ended". So if he made claims and captains have different viewpoints on situation, there still could be discuss and new decision after the game. Am I right?
|
|
lasssesamenstroem
Free Agent
Posts: 56
Likes: 52
I am Offline
Last On: Oct 9, 2015 20:15:50 GMT 1
|
Post by lasssesamenstroem on Feb 11, 2015 19:54:39 GMT 1
I wanna have a lose for the team which is not on time or 20 (30?) minutes later to the confirmed time. No possibility to use a delay for that.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
I am Offline
Last On: Apr 24, 2024 18:31:15 GMT 1
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2015 20:04:21 GMT 1
Since when Chelsea and Liverpool players play on internet connection and their performance depends on stability of internet? I only understand that its better to make decision during that pause, so we know what score it currently is in the moment + captains agreement on fp is easier and admins dont have work after the game. Since am here :drogba:
|
|
Vida
Free Agent
Vesmirni Lide
Call me a spaceman!
Posts: 734
Likes: 679
I am Offline
Last On: Sept 12, 2020 0:34:11 GMT 1
|
Post by Vida on Feb 12, 2015 17:07:19 GMT 1
Since when Chelsea and Liverpool players play on internet connection and their performance depends on stability of internet? Injury can be analog of some lag, I think =)) Its not like injury... In this case, its way different and you cant compare this But I agree that if there is schedulled day + time, teams should appear and play it... Doesnt matter IF THEY DONT APPEAR OR DONT HAVE 3 PLAYERS, they cant use delay and its defwin! And doesnt matter if some of their players have lags & doesnt matter if its captain or top scorer of league. It can happen but the teams have more players also because of this and all 2 teams cant waste the (schedulled) time because of this. Its just annoying, and this can give more opportunities to another players in teams who wait on chance. So like you said, just substitute player during the game if lags or play all the game with another player.
|
|
Vida
Free Agent
Vesmirni Lide
Call me a spaceman!
Posts: 734
Likes: 679
I am Offline
Last On: Sept 12, 2020 0:34:11 GMT 1
|
Post by Vida on Feb 12, 2015 19:03:27 GMT 1
I wanna have a lose for the team which is not on time or 20 (30?) minutes later to the confirmed time. No possibility to use a delay for that. Yes, I agree This is annoying. One team cant be punished with waiting by irresponsibility of another team.
|
|